The Intersection of Nature and Culture Essay Example for Free

The Intersection of Nature and Culture analyzeSemiotics is a theatre which stems from the work and theories of Ameri tidy sum logician C. S. Peirce and the French linguist Ferdinand de Saussure. The idiom originates from the Grecian word seemeiootikee, which denotes the study of soft touchs, what they represent and signify, and how homo creations play, interact and think in their universe. This pitchfork of learning and accord can be best described as a system of many communication theories and techniques which can be viewed as pieces of a puzzle. When these fragments ar committed and pieced together, they make visible, the intricate design of human interaction and interpersonal communication.Semiotics lies intermediary between philosophy and philology and is nothing less than an bearingification, or self-expression, or sayation and the work onation and comprehension of import. This area of study is a combination between scientific discipline and a world-view. Sem iotics is an enormously broad approach to understanding such matters as mean, cognition, coating, behavior, even livelihood itself.At the heart of this discipline lies the notion of sign. A sign, according to Charles S. Peirce, widely ac familiarityd to be superstar of the seminal thinkers about semiotics, is something which stands to somebody for something in some respect or capacity. It is the study of signs and symbols as agents of communicatory behavior and the analysis of systems of communication. These signs take the form of words, images, sounds, acts or aims, but have no genuine importee and become signs only when we invest them with subject matter- nothing is a sign unless it is interpreted and brings about some form of meaning.Understanding semiology assists in the true understanding of ones self, another(prenominal)s, and how we view the world around us. Inherently, humans are reactors. Because it is human nature to act, or react toward people, items, and instance s on the basis of preconceived meanings that have been assigned, it is beneficial to understand that to each one sign or symbol will have a different meaning to each unmarried it is presented to. Because of communication filters and barriers (which can also be signs and symbols) no message is ever received the exact expression it is sent. (See Appendix A)Similarly, e real number sign encountered can be decipherd and interpreted differently depending on preconceived notions, culture and personal experience. A signifier whitethorn induce many different interpretations of the signified (See Appendix B and D).This theory of signs and symbolism is divided into branches including pragmatics, semantics, and syntactics. Pragmatics is the branch of semiotics which deals with the causative and other dealings between words, expressions, or symbols and their users. It can be an analysis of language in terms of the situational context within which utterances are made, including the knowled ge and beliefs of the speaker and the relation between speaker and listener. Semantics is the study of the relationship between words and meanings.The field of semantics has collar fundamental concerns the relations of words to the objects denoted by them, the relations of words to the interpreters of them, and, in symbolic logic, the formal relations of signs to one another semantics is concerned with such issues as meaning and truth, meaning and thought, and the relation between signs and what they mean. Syntactics is the branch of semiotics dealing with the formal properties of language and systems of symbols. Innis proposes that, fundamentally these areas of thought deal with meanings and messages in all their forms and in all their contexts.There are three ways in which the sign can stand for its object as icon, index or symbol. An icon is a sign that stands for an object by resembling it, not entirely visually, but by any means. An icon makes a connection by similitude. Incl uded in this course of sign are obvious examples like pictures, maps and diagrams and some not so obvious ones like algebraic expressions and metaphors. Indexes refer to their objects, not by virtue of any similarity relation, but by an actual causal link between the sign and its object smoke is an index of fire. The relation between the sign and its object is substantial in that the sign and object have something in common that is, the object affects the sign.It is physically connected to the object. Symbols refer to their objects by virtue of a law, rule or convention. Words, propositions and texts are obvious examples in that no similarity or causal link is suggested in the relation between, for example,the word horse and the object to which it refers. In this category especially the potential arbitrary character of signs comes to the foreground. If symbols need bear no similarity or causal link to their object, then the signs can be considered by the sign user in unmeasured w ays, independent of any physical relationship to the sign user. The convention between recognizing a sign and the meaning which is provoked is affected by perception and experience.What appears to be a complex ideology is really very simple. Semiotics is everywhere, in every part of daily life. Humans recognize patterns of information and organize them to turn back meaning. The sign is the signifier, and what speaks to us is the signified. We see a sign, internalize it, and create meaning. The Semantic Triangle, (Appendix E) shows the indirect relationship between symbols and their referents. Some signs are culturally universal and convey similar meaning in individuals (Appendix F). Some signs act as instructions or directions, and guide or restrict behaviors.For instance, if a sign with a posterior encompassed by a red circle and a bar through the middle is on boast in a business it is understood that there is no smoking on the premises. This image has regulate meaning. Some si gns act as reminders. An image in of a young child in a magazine may serve as a sign for an aging mother and the signified may be a sense of sadness as her children have grown and moved on. The perception of meaning and the ability making sense out of the information that is world transmitted by these signs is an essential element of human communication.The study and application of semiotics is the frame work for representing meaning. Reality is encoded with signs and symbols and life is but to decode and find meaning. We seem to be a species driven by a desire to make meaning above all, we are surely homo-significans meaning-makers within which signs are meaningful units taking the form of words, images, sounds, acts or objects. such(prenominal) things have no intrinsic meaning and become signs only when we invest them with meaning. And it is this meaning-making which is at the heart of the concerns of semiotics.The event that humans can consume and interpret signs which are arb itrary and have no tangible world in their immediate experience is what makes thought possible and is distinctly human. Ideas can be brought to mind and manipulated without being directly experienced. Meanings can be expressed in various ways, through a variety of sign systems language, music, gesture and by many other vehicles. The meaning that is found within these signs creates the psychological and emotional purlieu we live in. Signs can also communicate ideological or connotative meaning, and perpetuate the dominant determine of society.Aristotle claimed that a thing either is or it isnt. Semiotics is the arbitrator of this existence and because things can be decoded and decipher differently by each individual, there is much grey area between the is and the isnt. By being aware of the way we use and interpret signs and symbols, and understanding the effects of these things on communication and interaction we are increasing and recognizing cognitive complexity so as to bette r approximate the halftones of this symbolically mediated real world.The meanings of signs and symbols are mediated by our experience and understanding of the world can never be the kindred for each person. Thomas Sebeok proposes that semiotics lies at the intersection of nature and culture. It is human nature to see and interpret signs but many of the signs we see are culturally adopted. However, we create our world of meaning by construe signs as we interact with objects in our environment and by personal experience.Having an understanding of Semiotics and its branches can overhaul one to better understand their own psyche, as interpreting and finding meaning has much to do with self-disclosure. It also brings an understanding of others into the framework. The concept of semiotics and the ability to comprehend the notions can become a flushed thing and be advantageous to the ability to communicate interpersonally, connect on a deeper level, and interact with other people and t he world aroundReferencesBarthes, Elements of Semiology (1967) A. A. Berger, Signs in ContemporaryCulture An Introduction to Semiotics (1988).Buchler, J. (Ed.). (1955). Philosophical literary works of Peirce. New York DoverInnis, R. (Ed.). Semiotics An Introductory Anthology. Bloomington, IN IndianaUniversity Press.1983Sebeok, T. Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs.Lisse Peter de Ridder Press.1976.Unknown, Steps towards evolutionary Semiotics. Semiotica 132, 3/4 (317-342).2000