Critically assess the implications of Social Contrant Theory (SCT) for Essay

Critically assess the implications of Social Contrant Theory (SCT) for relations between the man-to-man and state - Essay Exampleovernment and state in the current times, and provides a strong justification of the limitation of the power of the state against the citizens, and the corresponding authority of the lot to establish a government that will serve the common good and embody the peoples ideals and aspirations.Thomas Hobbes political philosophy of social deoxidise theory is outlined in the hypothetical State of Nature. In his Leviathan published in 1651, he articulated on a particular theory of serviceman nature that gives a rise to a particular view of morality and politics (Gauthier 1988). He rejects the theory of Divine Rights of Kings, indirectly refuting Filmers claim that a kings authority is invested in him by God, enjoys an absolute authority, in which the basis of political obligation lays in an individuals obligation to come after God absolutely. Hence, this theo ry of Filmer, which Hobbes rejects in his social Contract theory, states that political obligation is subsumed under religious obligation (ibid). Rather, Hobbes argued that obligation and political authority are pendant upon the individuals self-interests of members of society who are taken as equals of the others, with no single individual given an absolute authority to rule over the rest, spell at the same time, poses that if society is to survive, the Monarch (Sovereign), must be given absolute authority (Baier 1994). Hobbes describes the human being as exclusively self-interested and reasonable, possessing the rational competency to pursue his dreams as maximally as possible. He argues that mans reason does not evaluate their given ends rather it merely finds the way to the things Desired, describing tenableness as purely instrumental (ibid). It is from these premises that Hobbes is able to construct a provocative and compelling argument for why individuals would tend to be willing to lease themselves to a political authority. He explains this through his discussion of the State of Nature, in which